The most famous baby in the world

Pop superstar Madonna leaves a gym in northwest London. REUTERS/Stephen Hird
The furore surrounding the Madonna adoption saga shows no sign of dying down. The Malawian child's father Yohane Banda told Reuters television this weekend he had understood the popstar would only raise his child on his behalf, rather than adopt him. This fuelled another round of comment in the world's press.
"Madonna says that when he is old enough she plans to introduce her adopted son...David Banda to Malawian culture. All she has to do is cut off the electricity and water and empty the freezer and she will be halfway there to the true Malawian experience," quips British journalist and author Tony Parsons in the Mirror newspaper. Parsons thinks David is better off out of Malawi, where children spend hours collecting clean water rather than studying in school.
Britain's Guardian traces the story of "the most famous baby in the world", from his birth and his mother's death six days later to his arrival in Britain. The article sheds light on some of the lesser-known details of his case.
It recounts the dilemma faced by David's father, who still had to pay off the dowry to his deceased wife's family while working full-time on his farm and looking after a newborn baby. In these circumstances, placing the baby in care may have seemed like the best thing to do.
After consulting his mother and the village chief, Yohane decided to send David to an orphanage, cycling twice a week on a borrowed bike to visit his son - a 50-mile (31km) round trip.
As the article points out, the decision to place your own child in an orphanage may seem "callous" in the West, but in Malawi, it's quite the opposite: a selfless act, aimed at giving the child access to opportunities.
"On a continent where treatable diseases each year claim the lives of four million children under the age of five, 250,000 mothers die from childbirth, and 40 million children can't afford to attend school, raising all your children under one roof is more than many families can manage," agrees Michela Wrong, a Kenya-based British journalist, writing in the weekly New Statesman magazine.
Wrong points out that Africans don't love their children any less than their Western counterparts, but for some, letting their extended family or even friends raise their child is the best way of boosting their chances.
Ellen Vanstone, writing in Canada's Toronto Star, also defends Madonna's move and concludes that "[t]he celebrities parade their private lives and we react mindlessly and viscerally with a thumbs up or a thumbs down perhaps to feel superior for a moment to someone vastly more powerful or privileged than us, or at least to divert ourselves from our own mundane lives."
No laws have been broken and there's no proof Madonna bribed any officials in Malawi in order to speed up the adoption process, adds Vanstone. And as for claiming that the charity Madonna has donated to is a front for spreading Kabbalah, prosyletising has been the purpose of Christian missionaries for the last 500 years, she argues.
D. Parvaz, a reporter for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, points out that Madonna's critics have forgotten someone really important amid all the noise: David.
Yet her actions have at least shone the spotlight on Africa's vulnerable children, argues Britains' Observer newspaper. Love or loathe Madonna, it concludes that her decision to adopt has sparked a lively international debate about the future of these children. The paper quotes Rob Jamieson, editor of Malawi's Chronicle newspaper: "Madonna has focused international attention on our problem...I don't know why she picked Malawi, but thank God she did."
Australia's The Age also believes Madonna has done Malawi a favour, becoming an "aid worker's dream by highlighting Malawi's needs".
Michael Wines, writing from Johannesburg for the New York Times , argues there are also financial benefits: "Africans are the cause celebre of celebrities these days, and the spectacle they create, comically riveted by their own righteousness, can seem almost a caricature of Hollywood shallowness. But Malawians are laughing en route to the bank."
To read the previous world media digest on Madonna's adoption move, click here.
Any views expressed in this article are those of the author and not of Reuters.
6 responses to “The most famous baby in the world”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.





23 Oct 2006 21:22:02 GMT
What I find most depressing about the whole saga is the degree of cynicism of those claiming that an adoption of a child could be a publicity stunt. Get real. Are these critics parents? David is a year old, so Madonna is making at least a 17 year commitment to this baby, bringing him into her family. Would you really complicate your life to that degree for a publicity stunt? Granted, if you are Madonna you can afford to have help with the child-rearing, but is it so far fetched to believe that she and her huband wanted to add to their family as she stated. As an adoptive parent of an African child, I can attest that there are myriad reasons for adopting a child, but I will still choose to believe that Madonna, and other adoptive parents do so at least, in part, to help make a real difference in the life of a child.
24 Oct 2006 02:51:08 GMT
So she gets a baby, and that infant gets a far better life quality than it otherwise probably would have had. Underinformed as I may be, I dislike the fact such a celebrity could have helped far more families there in other ways than by taking a baby away.
For example, sponsoring the expansion of the orphanage and its resources (like turning the power on and filling up the fridges, helping to improve the water supply/infrastructure). It simply seems nasty to leave the place in the same wretched state as before (minus one baby), if that is what has been done.24 Oct 2006 02:51:53 GMT
I would love to raise a child regardless of color or background. Unfortunately I do not have an extra ten thousand or twenty thousand laying around to spend. Why cant good people like my husband and I adopt a child without having to go without because of finances? There are so many babies in the world that need loving homes to go to, but I will have to remain childless and heartbroken because my body would not produce children.
24 Oct 2006 02:53:32 GMT
I think the child would definitely have a better chance being adopted than staying in his community. I do not, however, believe that he should be adopted into Madonna's family. Her ideals are twisted and her child will be the same. They're all twisted.....I used to enjoy her music until she got all weird.
24 Oct 2006 13:33:58 GMT
No good dead ever goes unpunished.
Because this is Madonna, a desperately poor child from a desperately poor country will probably be sent home rather than being raised with all the advantages that wealth can provide. Shame on those so-called child-protection organizations seeking to prevent this adoption. Sounds like envy to me.24 Oct 2006 16:57:37 GMT
These children are abandoned by the millions. The father now informed and enabled by those manipulating him will probably take some under the table payout and let the child he didnt care about to begin with go.